Artistotle's Virtue Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Artistotles Virtue Ethics - Essay ExampleThis is an ever-going debate between good theorists and moral philosophers, which seems to have no end. Neverthe little, when deontologists and Teleologists are debating on what matters the most, either the actions in themselves or the consequences of those actions, Aristotles virtue morals provides a solution, which asks to focus on the being or the person preferably than his or her actions and consequences (Devettere, pp. 26-28). Aristotle believed that ethics is not a theoretical discipline since one does not ask this dubiety for the sake of just knowing it but the question of what is good for hu spell beings is for achieving that good (Hursthouse, pp. 103-104). However, important here to differentiation is the fact that when Aristotle is taking about the good, he is talking about a list of ethical actions and duties, instead he is focusing on one highest good which is above all other goods (Hursthouse, pp. 103-104). One of the most i mportant reasons why Virtue ethics stands out of the crowd of other normative theories is because it makes a clear distinction between ethics for humans and animals. Aristotle identified the difference between form and sensible substance. According to him, the human body is made of flesh and this is material substance but this is not what makes humans beings as human beings. The form, which is the somebody of the humans, is responsible for the equal (Devettere, pp. 26-28, 2002). Therefore, according to Aristotle, each living thing has a soul and it works in different capacities. For example, the perceptive soul is responsible for forming images and perception, the nutritive soul has the duty of growth, the locomotive soul takes care of the motion and others. These are common in both humans and animals, however, humans posses something other, which is not present with other animals and that, is the rational soul (Hursthouse, pp. 103-104). This is what draws the line between humans and animals and this special and extra gift to human beings must have the answer of what is good for human beings? Therefore, the good for human beings, the highest happiness, or the biggest virtue is reason and rationality. It is ethical to live your life according to your reason and logic or else you are worse than an animal (Darwall, pp. 265). As Aristotle argued, the function of man is activity of soul in accordance with reason, or at least, not without reason (Darwall, pp. 265-269). Aristotle believed that the thinker or a rational person is the best person or the closest to the divine being or more like divine being. He believed that the rational soul of human being is a occasion of the divine soul that we posses and by the use of the same, one can discover the mysteries of the universe. People who try to live their lives with vulgar pleasures are more like animals and less like humans because they fail to understand their own potential. However, important here to note is tha t reason for logic that Aristotle has identified is not subjective and will not differ from person to person but it is objective (Devettere, pp. 26-28). Therefore, for Aristotle and virtue ethicist, ethical is something, which is an action of an ethical person, rather than based on the actions or consequences of that action. It is important to note that when other ethical theories and moral philosophers talk about, rewards, punishments, courts, screenings, law, rules and regulations and others to